Skip to content

Follow us on:

Home » Featured Articles » Sides and Solosexuals: Challenging the Top and Bottom Dichotomy

Featured Articles

Sides and Solosexuals: Challenging the Top and Bottom Dichotomy

Sides - The Bator Blog

What if you don’t identify as a “top” or a “bottom” or even “vers”?

In gay male vernacular, the term “top” refers to the one who penetrates, and “bottom” is the one who receives. In some contexts, top and bottom are synonymous with dom and sub, but among men who have sex with men, it refers unanimously to anal sex. To this extreme, top and bottom are not merely sex positions, but categories that everyone is expected to fall into. If you like both, you can be “vers,” but no other options are given. What if you don’t identify with any of these?

The problem with the top and bottom dichotomy is that it is defined solely by one sexual activity. Placing all the emphasis on anal sex leaves no room for conversation about other sexual proclivities. I prefer to be asked, “What are you into sexually?” rather than “Top or bottom?” I can describe the things I like, he can describe the things he likes, and hopefully we can negotiate an experience that is pleasurable for both of us. That is how it should be.

The problem with the top and bottom dichotomy is that it is defined solely by one sexual activity.

When sex is defined solely by penetration, it dismisses and devalues other forms of sex. Everything else is disregarded as mere foreplay. The notion that a blowjob or hand-job is “not really sex” demonstrates the narrow mindset that pervades our culture. There is more to sex than fucking. Everything that provides erotic pleasure is sex. People enjoy many different things, and the universe is full of orgasmic potential. All forms of consensual sexuality are valid.

But still, many people just don’t get it. Those of us who don’t prefer penetrative sex are accused of being uptight. Some guys will even disrespect this boundary and say things like, “You just haven’t been with someone like me yet,” in an effort to persuade me to fuck him or vice versa. I’ve had a few first dates that never went beyond that because they couldn’t understand why I didn’t want anal sex. One guy even said I was “acting weird” when I asked him if we could masturbate together. There are many who simply cannot fathom the idea of something other than top or bottom, and react with confusion when I say “neither.”

There is more to sex than fucking. Everything that provides erotic pleasure is sex. People enjoy many different things, and the universe is full of orgasmic potential. All forms of consensual sexuality are valid.

There is nothing wrong with anal sex, but no one should be pressured into doing something that makes them uncomfortable. There are so many other ways that people can have fun together. There are also reasons why some people cannot partake in penetrative sex at all. Some may have medical conditions that prevent them from doing so. It is also important to acknowledge that some men don’t have a cisgender penis, so defining sex as “penetration required” is disrespectful to trans bodies (although, of course, there are toys for that).

So how do we overcome this limitation in our sexual language? One of the most wonderful advancements over the past couple of decades is how our understanding of sexuality has greatly expanded. Human sexuality is complex, with a large number of variables, and each individual is unique. The language of sexuality is meant to evolve. It is not a one-size-fits-all. No one gets to define what someone else enjoys sexually. I’m grateful to live in a progressive time when people are defining their sexuality on their own terms.

One solution is to provide alternatives to the existing language to expand on the concept and open the doors for discussion. Several years ago, sex therapist Dr. Joe Kort introduced the term “side.” As the terms “top” and “bottom” focus exclusively on anal sex, “side” simply means a preference for everything else, all kinds of non-penetrative sex. Sides may enjoy kissing, cuddling, oral sex, mutual masturbation, frottage, nipple play, tit-fucking, foot-jobs, rimming, spanking, erotic massage, and more. As the possibilities of sides are numerous, there are probably more varieties of sides than there are tops and bottoms. There are also some tops and bottoms who are actually sides but haven’t realized it yet.

Another problem with the top and bottom dichotomy is that it adheres to heteronormative gender roles. The stereotype of a top is hyper-masculine with a huge cock, and the stereotype of a bottom is effeminate and submissive. Bottom-shaming is a major problem in the gay male community, and it’s completely misogynistic. Recently, one of my Facebook friends posted “normalize fem tops and masculine bottoms,” and I completely agree. But I think one of the best things about being a side is that it defies this binary thinking. There is no “either/or.” When we are “side by side,” so to speak, we are equal.

I think side is a good solution, but there are some who don’t like the term and believe it carries negative connotations. We need to challenge our notions of what the word really means, and consider the context in which it is used, in order to understand the implications of being a side.

I interacted with one individual who used the food analogy of “side dishes” being inferior to the “main course.” I strongly disagree. At Thanksgiving, the best foods are always the side dishes. The term “side dish” doesn’t imply inferiority; it is complementary. Side dishes are what make the meal interesting. No one goes to Thanksgiving dinner just to eat a dry-ass turkey. There are many people who omit the turkey altogether, and this same idea can also apply to sex.

I have also described it this way:

The top is your shirt, which is the “dominant” part of your outfit because it is often the most prominent.

The bottom is your pants, which are just as beautiful as the top, and serve as a foundational or supportive piece, “holding up the rear,” as it were.

Sides are the belt, hat, scarf, jewelry, watch, shoes, bag, and other details and accessories that complete the outfit. These may serve practical functions or simply just make us look and feel good. Tops and bottoms are okay on their own, but it’s the sides that make the outfit interesting.

So basically, being a side means preferring all the good stuff that people treat as inferior or take for granted. The only issue I have is, since the term “side” is derived from “top” and “bottom,” sex can then be reduced to either “anal” or “not-anal.” This is also an overly simplistic view. As human sexuality is complex, I do think that sides can enjoy anal sometimes. Some may enjoy rimming, fingering, or solo play with toys. You also don’t have to identify as a side at all. There are some guys on Twitter who use the term “no-pen,” which states a clear preference for non-penetrative sex. There are many men who specify their preference for certain activities such as frot buddies and circle jerks.

The best solution is to just say what we want and use our vocabulary like adults. We live in a time where, for the most part, it is no longer necessary to resort to coded language. We have come a long way since the days of hanky colors, and we have the ability to be more open than ever before. We have the technology to communicate instantaneously, but instead of using it clearly and comprehensively, we have reduced ourselves to lazy shorthand. Expand your erotic vocabulary. Have a stimulating conversation.

Speaking of hands, you know I saved the best for last. Since sex is erroneously defined by intercourse, and therefore something you do with other people, solo sex is not taken seriously. It is often considered a last resort and inferior substitute. If someone can’t get laid, they masturbate. It is treated as embarrassing and disappointing, instead of remarkable and empowering as it is meant to be. Solo sex is the key to ecstatic bliss and erotic freedom.

For many guys, a good bate is the main course. Some simply prefer having sex by themselves. There are some who identify only as solosexual, but many also identify with other sexual orientations, and may have sex with other people. There are many, like me, who are both side and solosexual. But we must respect that solo sex is just as valid as partnered sex. We are currently in the midst of a solosexual revolution, and I am excited to be a part of it. I will be writing much more about this in my upcoming book.

For many guys, a good bate is the main course.

In summary, sex is expansive. It is meant to grow and blossom instead of being suffocated by the limitations of fixed categories and stagnant, outmoded ideas. It is imperative to keep an open mind and make every conscious effort to include perspectives other than our own. We must try to stop defining people by pre-approved labels and allow everyone to enjoy their sexual experiences in their own words, whatever they may be.

Masturbate with your buds and fellow sides on Bateworld.com

Go here for more articles by Stroking The Soul

Follow him on Twitter @StrokingtheSoul


View all posts by Stroking The Soul

Anthony Ragonese (Brother Antonello) is the founder of the Fraternity of Autoerotic Phallicism (FAP) and the author of the upcoming book, “Stroking the Soul.” He is a proud and avid member of Bateworld.

A self-proclaimed Cockmonger and Witch of Wankery, his interests and passions include sacred bodywork, self-love, body positivity, erotic spirituality, and sex magic. He is also a poet as well as pursuing other creative endeavors.

Related Posts

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

5 Comments

  1. I love that “side guys” is getting traction! We are way overdue for breaking the anal-centric fundamentalism of MSM social culture.

  2. After a few tries at anal sex, top and bottom, I realized I most definitely didn’t fit in either category. I have happily found my place in the sexual world and it is not in someone’s ass or someone in mine. Thanks for possibly enlightening others.

  3. I’m in a 10 years relationship and I love my partner very much. I finally understood that we are sides because we kiss, masturbate and other stuffs but never penetrate each other. I’m happy there is a term for us “sides”. One thing is that I’m more sexual than he is but I like it solo… would this make me a solosexual and a guy in a LTR?

  4. for what it’s worth, from a 40 year old who has been seeking these kinds of connections through masturbating for a long time. (and with full recognition that it is my own experience and may differ from your own experiences or preferences)

    i find that i typically have to say i am a gay masturbator or buddy bator because “side” has been used to just mean mostly oral (which i don’t want to do with everyone) or worse it means vers. i also think the framing of side fits in the top and bottom schema but somehow reinforces its lower status. even if i incidentally do have insertive sex it’s not really something i identify with and don’t like when people try to correct me toward the kinds of sex i am supposed to want.

    some of the weird insults and profile entries i’ve encountered with sides include: “oral fixation. vers only. raw is law. flip fucking only. straight fit masculine looking for bator bro to let me ride his bator hole. i guess oral only is ok. well i think people would want more than just bating together. how are you even gay.”

    none of those acts are what im looking for with a stranger, unfortunately, and the “main course” of masturbating together is strangely missing from the equation despite my stated interests and preferences for it.

    so i keep saying masturbator or buddy bator or gay penis stroker until the moments where others get where im coming from and we usually meet and have a good time. there’s just so much i have to sift through to get there and unfortunately side hasn’t been the great filter term i was hoping it could be a few years ago.